More Details On The Rock & Brock Lesnar’s WWE Contracts

Published On April 6, 2012 | By | Wrestling News, WWE News

As we reported earlier this week, Brock Lesnar’s contract with WWE is said to be a 1-year deal that pays $5 million and is for approximately 30-40 appearances, including matches.

Even before Brock Lesnar’s final UFC fight against Alistair Overeem in December, there was talk in the MMA world that Lesnar had a $5 million deal waiting for him in WWE. Vince McMahon was said to be “agreeable” on the idea of shelling out $5 million to bring Lesnar in, however there was a lot of negotiating before the two parties agreed on the number of appearances Lesnar would be obligated to make.

The Rock has also signed a 1-year contract with WWE that will see him wrestle a few times this year and at WrestleMania 29. With 12 months to go until next year’s big event, WWE already has its sights set on a Rock vs. Lesnar main event. WWE is looking to sell out WrestleMania the day that tickets go on sale, something the company hasn’t done since 2007.

WrestleMania 29 Matches: Early Plans for Lesnar, Rock, Austin

Something WWE has to consider with a Rock vs. Brock main event is the possibility of fans turning on both wrestlers, which happened during the infamous Brock Lesnar and Goldberg at WrestleMania 20. Back then, word got out that both Lesnar and Goldberg were leaving the company immediately after their WrestleMania match – and the New York crowd was merciless. Fast forward 9 years – and we could see another big Lesnar match at WrestleMania in front of a New York crowd that is aware both participants are making their final appearances for WWE.

(Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter)

Visit Our Other Sites:

Related Articles

The 3 Count – Heyman’s Third Client
The Rock Talks About His WWE Future & Favorite Superstars, Linda At WWE HQ
The Rock Tweets New ‘Fast 6′ Promo Picture, WWE Inbox Goes Extreme (Video)
Competitors Announced For “The Hero”

Check Out:

  • BobbyBobBobberson

    Personally I dont think either will be making their final appearances. I could imagine Brock signing on for another year and the way things are going I could see Rock signing something similar again. Big money and its something they both genuinely seem excited about

    • Jholt1482

       Big money for less work….. that’s the key

  • ALDO the APACHE

    That could end up being disastrous. But I don’t think they would boo a match with the rock and lesnar. Besides this isn’t concrete. This could change between now and wm 29.

    • pwnez

      The fact that WWE is thinking about sending off the Rock and Brock by having the crowd boo them doesn’t make sense to me especially seeing the reactions they both got upon their returns. If that’s the case everything that’s happened so far with the Rock would have been pointless.

      • Drmgiver

        The WWE isn’t in control of the crowd.  Remember, Daniel Bryan is supposed to be booed.

        • pwnez

          Obviously lol. That’s why Bryan told A.J. to shut up and to leave when he cut his promo on raw (after the show.) He still remained in chararacter.

    • http://twitter.com/AJCampbellNYG Andrew Campbell

      I don’t think the fans would boo either. I think the main reason the crowd booed during Lesnar vs Goldberg is because the match SUCKED.

      • Cult of Marks

        Brock and Goldberg were booed because they (the crowd) knew that both were leaving. It was funny that Stone Cold was cheered throughout the match, he was corpsing.

      • Jholt1482

         I agree, that Lesnar v Goldberg match could have been great but it’s gotta be in the top 10 worst matches in Mania history.

    • timmer_82

      I really don’t see the point in a Rock/Lesnar match. Other than to say ‘it’s the match that never happened’…but we just had that with Rock/Cena. I wouldn’t boo them,…but I’d be hesitant to buy that ppv.

      • Lord Spliffmeister

        Brock/Rock Summerslam 

        • timmer_82

          Not sayin’ it won’t happen…but damn…like we all don’t have better things to do. It just doesn’t seem awfuly appealing to me.

      • Jholt1482

         Lesnar took the belt from The Rock at Summerslam. That match wasn’t bad but it wasn’t good either and that was when they were both 10 years younger.

        • timmer_82

          Shit, you’re right. I completely forgot about that….wasn’t that important to me. So I’m even further in the direction of not wanting to pay to see it.

          • Lord Spliffmeister

            Yea thats the match I was talkin bout when Lesnar took the belt not this yrs.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001764277286 Marc King

    NO! NO! NO! …. They will sign another one year deal to take them to WM 30 , well im sure Lesnar will stick around alot longer than The Rock will…. YES! YES! YES! YES!

    • Macc28

      i agree rock has a part time contract he will and can always resign same goes for lesnar , rock came bacc to help build new stars the same should goes for lesnar 

      • #REALHEEL

        uh dude rock and lesnar aren’t building new guys they are just going along for a very profitable ride, once it ends they will jump off and no one will have gained shit from either of them being back. At best it will get WWE more exposure, and maybe some more people will watch but other then that it’s unlikely either of them are in it to help other guys.

        • BlazeDatIshUp

          I agree with ya.  I believe they said John Cena does help the young talent though, and he’s the ‘franchise player’ that everyone loves to hate, even though he’s there all the time, works hard, and they use him to bring back all these other wrestlers from almost 10 years ago, or when they wanna push some other wrestler.  I like Lesnar and the rock is ok, but they are in it for the very profitable ride, as you said.  I do think that there is a chance Brock may stay a little longer if he likes what is going on after the 30 toi 40 appearances, but the rock will likely leave and go back to movies.

          It would be nice if they could get Goldberg and Batista to come back.

          • Drmgiver

            And Goldberg was doing it for any reason then himself?  The man was reckless.  Batista?  Maybe, but I think he would have to work a bit harder to get over.

          • BlazeDatIshUp

            He was reckless because that was what the company wanted. Some of you people act like the wrestlers do any and everything they want, when we all know it’s scripted. It’s called entertainment.

            All wrestlers are in it for themselves to a degree, but then there are some who you can see that they enjoy helping others along the way, like Cena does. People like rock seem to be solely in it for themselves. I think it’s stupid that a wrestler can come back after almost a decade and be put into a main event at wm, while other superstars, who have been there day in and day out since he was gone, get pushed aside. Just plain dumb.

            As for Batista there are a ot of people who wish he was back, so there isn’t much to work at, except for bulking back up to about the size he was before, but he left because he didn’t like the pg stuff the company was, and still is, doing.

          • Ishagol

             I hate the fact that The Rock headlined wrestlemania too but it goes to show how much has change over the years. We all wish we could go back in time and watch Andre the Giant vs Hulk Hogan but wrestling is like a stock. Some good news come up and the stock goes up while recession hits the stock goes down. We’re in a pretty bad time right now and it’s especially disappointing for those who are older because we got to experience the pinnacle point of wrestling and watch it every week as it deteriorate.
            I find myself looking up videos of very old matches to remind myself of the good days. Every week I wish someone from old era would come back but I’m a little numb now with all the disappointments.
            The Rock headlining…all I can say is he’s still a money maker and he could still sell out. I bet if he didn’t come back wrestlemania wouldn’t even sell out. I wish anyone would come back, even scotty 2 hotty for god sake…too cool was awesome!

          • BlazeDatIshUp

            Yea he and Cena sold alot of tickets this year, but I just wish they could have made a great main event with the other wrestlers who are there day in and day out. I’m not dissin’ him, but they could have used another superstars who will be there after WM for more than just a few shows.

            My favourite wrestlers are The Undertaker, Bret Hart and Eddie Guerrero and I do like watching old matches with them in it too. I’m an 80′s baby who watched the now older wrestlers in their Primes or when some were fresh meat. I used to watch RAW and Smackdown more years ago, but I’ve gone weeks and months without watching until the past year or two. It’s just not the same no doubt. The storylines get ridiculous, and they keep making people into faces who are better as heels such as Randy Orton, Sheamus and CM Punk. I like Cena regardless, but he needs to turn heel and they should get rid of the PG crap and let people do their thing. Also it’s funny how a lot of people will hate on Cena, but they use him to bring back wrestlers, help other superstars progress in a storyline and in many other ways, so in a way they pushed him onto us too much. Some people are gonna get sick of him as a result, which is what is happening.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BSX5XEA6TQIYWYJ52RSJMPWKMY kevin

          Wrong, The Rock dont need the money him being there helps the wwe.He always said he wonted to give something back to wwe company,with him selling out crowds and geting hireing ppvs helps everyone not himself. 

    • http://twitter.com/AJCampbellNYG Andrew Campbell

      I’m sure Rock will stick around much longer than Lesnar will. No matter what some people like to think about him, Rock DOES have a passion for wrestling and I believe he will continue to make appearances after WM 29. Yes, he will still be an actor, but I’m sure he will keep coming back even if its just for a quick promo a few times a year.

      Lesnar, on the other hand, likes to live a quiet life and is one reason why he lives in the middle of nowhere. I like Lesnar, but he’s someone who has never seemed like he had a passion for professional wrestling, not to mention, he doesn’t like travel on the road. It took Lesnar two years in the WWE to realize that he didn’t want to wrestle anymore, so he pursued a career in the NFL. After he was cut, he left for UFC. He doesn’t seem like the type of guy who will stay doing one thing for too long.

      So I think WM 29 will likely be the last time we see Lesnar in a WWE ring, but I see The Rock still coming back every now and then for the occasional appearance.

      • pwnez

        I think fans need to realize and come to terms that the Rock is not going to be in the WWE forever. Hes going to leave the company again sooner or later. Now, that doesn’t mean he won’t make appearances every now and then but I see him cutting a promo once a year. Like the articles have said, things can change. I’m not exactly sure how they will go along with the Rock winning the WWE title. If he does somehow win it I see it being for a very short time.

        • Deleted_Account

          Rock will win the WWE title, drop it to Cena and leave.

          • Lbreslin89

            I see that happening

        • Lord Spliffmeister

          Lesnar will have the belt.He’s doing more shows,The Rock has movies 2 do.Rock said he wants the title if Lesnar is champ by RR The Rocks gonna come out n challenge him 4 Mania & there’s your main event.So 2 me it seems plausible.XD

      • http://twitter.com/FlipCity1017 Jager1017

        i agree on the lesnar hopping from one thing to the next, however, he’s explored those options, failed, and now he’s back in the wwe. i feel he’ll see the money he can make, see how much merch is selling, how much the crowd is ALL on him.. i feel he may re-sign in all honestly. even if just for one more year.

        • partsunknownresident

          Do you think that WWE will offer Lesnar the same kind of deal a second time?  I suppose they would if he turned out to be a big money maker for them during this current one year stint.  But I wonder how WWE would view Lesnar after one year, considering that, unlike the Rock, Lesnar was only in WWE for two years prior (four if you count developmental), and left a lot of wrestler’s hanging because they jobbed to put him over, only to have him leave abruptly to go do something else.  Now he’s back, and he’s getting a much lighter schedule than the other guys, and getting paid much better for it.  Unlike ‘Taker, who has given over 20 years of loyal service and paid his dues and, IMO, has earned the schedule that he’s on, I wonder if Vince would bend over backwards a second time to appease Lesnar, who hasn’t really shown a loyalty to WWE.

          Not that loyalty matters all that much in the WWE anyways.  Vince listens to the almighty dollar more than anything else, so I could see you being right.  But I just wonder if WWE would offer Lesnar the same sweet deal a second time, especially if he doesn’t live up to expectations, which I think are pretty high.       

          • Drmgiver

            Bottom line is, “loyalty” doesn’t matter.  It doesn’t even matter what Vince thinks.  It only matters what the fans think.  If the fans want him back, and he wants to stay, Vince will keep him, whether or not he likes him or not.

      • timmer_82

        I was never a Lesnar fan during his first run with WWE. But, after watching him in the UFC and getting to know a little more of what he’s all about I’m pretty excited that he’s back. I think that there are far more people now who will tune in to see him because they know him from UFC. I’m just glad that these signing’s open up a door of a few more possibilities when it comes to the storylines and rivalries. Ther are a number of ways you cna use the both of them, I think it’ll be fun. … And DAMN.., what if they could get Austin back in the ring! Think of the possibilities.

  • CJCarter

    This is all still a year away though. After one year is up, they may still decide to stick around.

  • Flint Gome

    I hate these guys that leave and go to MMA comeback and sign one year deals….Cena has been there all along and still he gets to lose to the Rock i thought tht was stupid….Austin lost to Rock and he left, the match was the passing of the torch and now u got Rock winning…utter stupidity

    • You Mad? Stop B***hin

      Question, You Mad? hahaha

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MJ2KXSXCK63OE2O3CTQDOXYZ7U stoops

      Who are “these guys” that have left for MMA and came back? Lesnar left to play football. Your boy Cena lost to the Rock because it is good for the business. This is about making money and Cena knows that. For years Cena has been beating everyone put in front of him. Cena is getting into these feuds with Rock and soon Brock because he has risen above the title picture and WWE is trying to elevate other stars. By the way SCSA needed to walk away because of medical reasons not because he was passing the torch. 

      • Guest

        While I agree w/ a lot of what u said, I don’t know Rock winning is GOOD for biz unless there will be a rubber match.  Not that Cena needs anybody else to put his @ss over, but all this does is widen the gap between him and every other wrestler who are in REAL need of getting that push to break the glass ceiling.  Ppl like Daniel Bryant, Shameus, Ziggler, and Swagger come to mind for ppl that could be the next big main eventers, but they need a good storyline.  In Shameus’ case, he’s a terrible face and needs to go back to being a heel, much like Orton.

        • Bushwald Sexyface

          It’s good for business because it adds intrigue to Cena’s character. He loss. The #1 thing trending on Twitter when that happened was #TheRockWON. Very few people expected it.

          It practically put an end to the Super Cena era. That’s is not only good for business, it’s great.

    • askbillmitchell

      Okay technically no one left to go to MMA. Brock as already noted wanted to pursue a NFL career with the Minnesota Vikings and was later cut then he trained for MMA. Batista, left because he has some issues about the PG WWE and opted not to resign a new contract, mostly did movies but did train for a MMA career that never happened and finally there is Bobby Lashley, while it was believed he left WWE to go into MMA the truth was he left because of some difference of opinion that he has with WWE creative at the time (most notably w/Michael PS Hayes).

      Austin left due to injury – Much similar to Edge’s injury that forced him to retire. The Rock would have still been the Rock and not gone anywhere had the WWE done their home work, and resigned the Rock to a new contract when his old one was on the verge of expiring. It was a misunderstanding that ended up blowing up in the WWE’s face. That’s right folks WWE didn’t resign the Rock, thus the Rock went to Hollywood, the Rock didn’t leave the WWE for Hollywood.

      The problem that Vince had with the Rock was not him leaving the WWE but when was discovered a mistake had been made, and the WWE tried to reach out to the Rock with a new contract, the Rock was starting to make good money in Hollywood presumably  better money than he was making at the WWE with less of a work schedule. The WWE can compete with the money but they demand a return on their investment, which was something that the Rock wasn’t ready to agree with at the time.

      Contrary to popular belief, perception wasn’t reality in this case. Only one wanted out of their contract, the others mention either left for personal reasons, injury or a WWE blunder.

  • http://twitter.com/DA_Righteous1 Brian Clark

    The Rock is filming back to back films that will be released next year So most likely THe Rock is going to be back for full time wrestling soon. Brock should do just one year, because you don’t know how his body will react to all this for another year. Hopefully, this makes Kurt Angle realize where he is suppose to be.

    • 96Fan

      I just don’t believe he will be back full time. The risk is too high, and while I agree it is good to have The Rock back to finish his wrestling career as he should have in the first place, I don’t see the risk outweighing the reward he could get working more in Hollywood than WWE. It’s just more guaranteed money for less risk and less work.

      • http://twitter.com/DA_Righteous1 Brian Clark

         It is not about money for a lot of them. Plus, I just want to see him and Jericho get the proper send off they deserve. Truly I would not have cared if they came back. I am satisfied with my Fast Five DVD and Fozzy albums.

      • Bushwald Sexyface

        I don’t think the WWE title would be brought up if he didn’t have plans to return to at least 75% full time. 

    • Drmgiver

      Kurt Angle is happy where he is.  He gets livable money, and doesn’t travel as much.

  • Ihatetrolls

    I wonder how much Rock’s deal commands.  I can see Lesnar sticking around since retiring from UFC, but that seems dependent on the money since he doesn’t have anything to fall back into.  He’ll have to do produce as far as raising revenue in order to get another deal like that.
    With that being said, Brock could very well challenge for Undertaker’s streak by Wrestlemania.

  • Guest

    Rock v Brock > Rock v Cena and will sell out WM 29 too.  When I think about it though, those titles have definitely lost value in the WWE.  I can’t remember WMs past when the title matches didn’t close out a WM, but I think that has to do with a lack of Superstar Build-up.  Edge v ADR was the 1st time a World title match opened WM much like DB v Shameus which speaks to the lack of build put in the titles. 
    Neither Rock v Stone Cold or Rock v HH closed out WM and they were as big as Rock v Cena.  Just saying they need to step their value game up in those titles again b/c they’re starting to look like props instead of milestones to reach.

    • Tiran66

      They’re not starting to look like props, they are props, and have been for a very long time.  Punk is starting to make the WWE title feel important again, because you can tell he legitamately views it as important.

  • http://twitter.com/AchillesF6 Zachary

    So this is basically WWE’s apology for Brock vs Goldberg WM 20?

  • #REALHEEL

    Uh from what Rock said on monday he may be coming back at some point on a more regular bases. As for Lesnar let’s see how the year goes, he may decide he wants to stick around a bit longer.

    • Drmgiver

      And you still believe anything the Rock says?  You know I have this bridge that is up for sale….

      • BobbyBobBobberson

        Can you explain why you dont believe the Rock? He said he would come back for 1 wrestlemania, ejoyed it so much he agreed to a match and despite the guys hectic movie schedule (for a lot more $) came back and wrestled twice in the last year and made dozens of appearances. He DOESNT have to do that…hes doing it for the fans to show hes greatful and douchebags like you still say you cant believe him….

  • 96Fan

    I am still very uncomfortable with the idea of The Rock with the title. Lesnar is a different person coming in now that he once was: the guy held the UFC Heavyweight title, so putting the belt on him adds a level of realism which I think is good for WWE. “Look at our guy, he is a legit badass.” And from the sound of it he will at least make almost every RAW and PPV. I can’t see the Rock having that kind of run considering how many movies he’s taking on.

    Please understand, I am a fan, but there is a lot of risk putting the belt on either guy. Yeah, IT DRAWS (and that is the first priority of any wrestling promotion), but what happens to the guys you need to cultivate to really put them in a place where they can draw a WrestleMania without the Rock, Austin, Hogan, Lesnar, etc.? It hurts guys like CM Punk, Dolph Ziggler, Daniel Bryan, Orton, I could go on. Unless they swerve us and have Rock or Lesnar drop the title before Mania to one of them (which I think would be pretty cool because that would be an awesome rub), what do you do with those guys?

    See, I can somewhat understand the frustration in the back: “Are we going to be given an honest shot?” Let’s all be truthful here–Wrestling’s days of drawing a 5-6 Nielsen is long gone. There is too much high level competition on TV and the Internet, and PPV is going out the window as well. Yeah, they just did a 1.9 million buy rate, but can you really keep relying on nostalgia to get that? I think what draws me as a fan to Austin vs. Punk for the title (which I while I am mark for both, I believe it makes more sense than Brock vs. Rock). I think it is really cool that Rock came back to wrestle Cena. It was literally the old vs. the new guard, and I think you could do that with CM Punk vs. Austin. These are pass the torch matches, in my mind. 

    • Bushwald Sexyface

      Just the mere fact that Rock wants the title gives it boosted credibility. If he wins it, it hurts the title none. It’s not like he’s going to win it and only wrestle twice a year. 

      • Drmgiver

        Pretty much what Hogan and Warrior did with it isn’t it?

        • 96Fan

          That was a bit different: They handed Warrior the strap because his sales figures were really good, but when it came time to actually have a run with the belt, it flopped because Jim is out of his mind and decided more often than not to go into business for himself. It was doomed before it could really do anything huge. If anything it proved how much WWF still needed Hogan, who was the only consistent draw in that era.

          The problem here is that neither Brock nor Rock should be counted on to be consistent, and not because they aren’t great. They are–but are they really sticking around long enough to have meaningful title reigns? Time will tell, but at this point I just can’t see it.

          I think CM Punk has done a damned good job, and no matter what the fickle marks on this site want to say, he has proven to be a legit babyface. Just the fact he outsold John Cena for one month is the closest anyone has gotten to being THAT over. And I think it is time for Ziggler and Bryan to really get the attention they deserve, along with Orton, Henry, Kane. Bottom line, they have guys they could make real long-term money with versus guys they could make money with on the short-term. 

      • 96Fan

        How is the Rock holding the title ONE more time giving the belt any credibility? Yeah, it would make a comeback full-circle, but this isn’t a real comeback, is it? Also, who is going to be sacrificed so fanboys like you are happy? The problem is that all these past champions highlight one important distinction: WWE does not want to invest in their current crop of Superstars, which they need to because the days of Rock, Austin, Brock, what have you are going out the window.

        Also, fake or not, having a guy day in and day out defending that belt gives it credibility, and I just don’t think the Rock is the guy to do that considering his schedule. PLEASE NOTE: I am not saying it is a bad thing that the Rock is back; I am just saying that putting the title on him has more risk than actual reward, even more so than putting it on a guy like Brock, who just came off a very successful run in the UFC. If I had to choose between the two I put it on Brock in a heartbeat.

  • BrahmaBullRKO

    I don’t think it would be that way this time around. When Lesnar and Goldberg fought, they were full-time employees who were both on their way out with no foreseeable return. This time we have Rock and Lesnar. They will most likely be done after Mania 29, but that’s just common sense. We knew from the minute they came back that they wouldn’t be here for very long, so why boo them for it? If I get to go next year, I’ll destroy my vocal chords cheering for them.

  • Justrockit

    This isn’t 2004…and will take rock Brock once a year over the crap we see all year long.

  • http://twitter.com/number1bigdaddy eatingherpoundcake

    the rock is the next will smith,funny and can sell the movie

  • Bushwald Sexyface

    There’s a simple way to make sure the crowd doesn’t turn on you. If you’re Rock or Lesnar, you announce that you’re not leaving after WM29 and you announce it this year.. 

    • 96Fan

      Yeah, but one of them can’t guarantee that. Say what you will, The Rock’s real bread is made in movies. There no point is walking away to wrestle full-time when you are already making huge bank, passion or no passion.

      Now on the other hand, I can see Lesnar sticking around if this year goes well. With only one to two days on the road and a shitload of money I think he will find this go around much more amiable.

  • GoGoGadget

    Why in the hell do everyone wants to see Brock and Rocky wrestle? These guys dont even wrestle like they use to. All they want is the fame and money. They can suck it.
    Rocky can go kiss his directors ass and Brock can just go back to sucking in UFC. These guys dont represent Wrestling at all.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EO45SUVQJNAX5ZNOYRX2ZXS42Y dae5

      I thought it was an “end of an era” at WM28 so why bring back two wrestlers to fight eachter from that era at WM29?

      • ProgressNow2012

        because Lesnar isn’t an Attitude era guy……..DUUUUUUUH. and learn to spell, will ya? you’re killing me

    • Fear No Evil

      If you think The Rock wants FAME & MONEY (which he gets more of both doing movies) then you my friend are a freakin idiot. You myst be a Cena fan, so go tell your American idol to keep sucking Vince’s dick.

  • Bushwald Sexyface

    Where’s the outrage for a guy coming back ONLY for the money? 

    • Drmgiver

      If you were paid enough to wrestle 20 minutes in a ring, would anything else be a factor to you?

      • Bushwald Sexyface

        See my reply to the other person.

    • Guest

      At least they can wrestle work the crowd unlike cena booed out every arena especially at the end of the rumble of 2008 being #30 oh yah lots of Vince’s KMAC there

      • Bushwald Sexyface

        Yeah, I was being sarcastic. My message was directed at everyone who whined about Rock coming back and thinking he was doing it for the money. Yet those same people have said nothing about Lesnar.

        • Guest

          Brock did everything heavyweight wise faster & even got King of the ring over the rock. Brock was at a dead end & left he had nothing left to prove. He went to NJPW too & won the title there too & dropped it to angle(awesome rematch from WM) Brock knows the politics he knew Vince got despreate with cena after he left. Now that he’s been pushed as a poster boy which nobody cares even getting a #30 spot in the rumble 08 & won the guy can’t wrestle & got exposed. Both Brock & rock did thing ok haters inside & out of wrestling trust me if the “marine” didn’t flop “we won’t C cena either” he jump ship but in his case he’s garbage.

  • ProgressNow2012

    yeah they got 1-year contracts but it’s not set in stone. they can sign up for another year if they want. Lesnar was, I guess, burnt out in WWE at the time, and Goldberg was bored, so yeah they had to leave. now here’s hoping WWE learns from their big-ass mistakes and treat them better.

    I sure know Dwayne got nothing to complain about, now let’s see how Lesnar feels at the end of the day……I’m sure SES will let us know.

  • Guest

    (cena theme) oh no my time is done, oh no my time is done Vince what have you done oh no my time is done

  • Satishwarne708

    New York will finally bring the pain to them if it happens!

  • Mr_DJ

    the New York crowd was extra vile because Lesnar and Goldberg bullshitted the entire match

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/April-Kaulitz/100002509905409 April Kaulitz

     WWE NEEDS THE ROCK MORE THEN THE ROCK NEEDS WWE AND THE ROCK SAVE WWE BECAUSE OF JOHN CENA PG SHIT THAT WHY batista left

  • WWE universe

    Now Vince,Bring back Batista!

  • Nightmare

    I would rather see this then Rock v.s Cena

  • GameXXX

    Yes Yes Yes 

  • DOOOSHBAG

    then again we will see ROCK vs BROCK  and AUSTIN as a refree. but AUSTIN is wretsling PUNK ::D thank god

  • Bryce Styles

    Cena v lesnar. Punk v Austin. Jericho v rock Or cena v lesnar v rock or lesnar v taker
    I Want Jericho vs rock. So much history :3

  • Jholt1482

    I don’t see where a CM Punk  v Stonecold match is all that good. Rock v Brock has been done before (when they were 10 years younger) and that match wasn’t even that great. Taker v Cena will never compare to Taker v Michaels or Taker v HHH. This is where they hurt themselves because Cena can’t work like those guys. The opponent should get better each year not take a step back. The only way it would be better is if Cena ended the streak, the match itself could suck but the shock of ending it would cancel all that out. I am not a fan of Cena or Taker so I don’t care either way.

  • Brett Lane

    I hope that they do have a match and that they both stay or at least one of them if they both leave then thats just lame!!!

  • Takeshidavid64

    Rock is the best in Raw, he is the best in the world