Update On WrestleMania 29 and Royal Rumble Scenarios – Discussed Idea For CM Punk vs. The Rock

WrestleMania29

With retaining the WWE Championship against Ryback and at Survivor Series on Sunday, thereby likely solidifying an expected match with Dwayne “” Johnson at , the sports-entertainment organization’s creative team has discussed a scenario where The Straight Edge Superstar would defeat The Great One at the annual January pay-per-view event. This would subsequently lead to Punk defending the title against The at XXIX, and Johnson facing Cena in a non-title re-match at the same event.

Original creative plans called for Johnson to defeat Punk at the Rumble, leading to a match against Cena for the title—which could still occur. Creative has given thought to how Johnson winning the WWE Championship would impact the product since there would be no titles defenses at houses shows for over two months, and also add a new issue of whether he would defend the title at the February pay-per-view event, . Not awarding Johnson would rectify this problem.

Though the importance of the WWE Championship and the World Heavyweight Championship has diminished in recent years, one of the primary reasons that creative has yet to unify the belts is because they feel a title match should close out all house shows.

(source: F4WOnline.com)

  • pwnez

    Punk vs Undertaker would be great but I can’t see Undertaker holding the bling bling title, it wouldn’t look right. If this does happen i’d like them to debut the new title design before WrestleMania. Also, having Punk defeat the Rock at the royal rumble would be pretty surprising; I don’t think fans would expect that.

    IMO the Rock shouldn’t win the title. I wouldn’t mind Cena vs Rock II as long as it’s a non-title match and that Punk/Taker is the last match of the night.

    • Stoops Nic

      Early word is that Punk is penciled in as the main event at WM. A match with Taker would cement that. Letting Punk stay champ till then only solidifies him as a top star with no one but Taker being able to best him. I personally am not a fan of the streak or Taker for that matter (still respect the hell outta him) and would like to see his streak end. No one has ever really gone out on top but with that said it doesn’t mean it can’t happen with Taker.

      • morrisonfanone

        And Taker has stated he’s all for WM as long as it’s a high profile match.

    • http://twitter.com/StupidSobi SOBI

      Punk vs Taker at Mania would be interesting
      because on one hand you know that Taker doesnt lose at WM
      on the other hand Taker is ending his career so a wwe title reign also looks unlikely.
      this could be a story line
      Brock will cause taker the the Match at WM thus making Punk a Legend.
      and Taker will return at WM 30 to beat Lesnar.
      but I personally dont want the streak to end

    • CMPeeP313

      i couldnt of said it any better

    • http://www.twitter.com/SouthKidd803 SavageBomber

      Taker wins the “bling bling” title and disappears with it, erasing it from the company.

      “Now we need a new belt…. And champion”

      (Since WWE like recycling ideas)

      “Well, let’s hold ANOTHER one of those WWE Championship tournaments like we did when Punk escaped with the title, but this time…. With an all new design. And it will all culminate on *insert 20 year RAW celebration episode date*”

      That’s the only way I can see this working, at least, other than what you said. And since the rumored date for the “20 year anniversary,” or whatever they’re choosing to call it, is shortly after Wrestlemania, it’ll make the new design seem like a much bigger deal.

      Ok, I know I could have just edited out the parts I had wrong, but what I was actually referring to was not RAW’s 20 year anniversary (as that would have to take place in January). I actually meant the 50 Year WWE Championship Celebration (Supposedly taking place in May). What better way to introduce a new design than at the 50 year anniversary of the championship?

      • morrisonfanone

        Good idea. But I cant see Taker leaving with the title.

    • ICEMAN

      Only you IWC people even care about this trivial BS that is the “bling bling” WWE title. The rest of the fanbase (95%) don’t even care man.

  • http://twitter.com/iKing92 Initializing….

    Anyone else think that Brock Lesnar will interfere in the Rock vs Punk match at RR , thus extending Punks reign of consecutive days and setting up Rock vs Brock at WM29 ? …….. What a faction PHG’s – Punk, Brock, Ambrose, Rollins & Reigns

  • GodsLoyalSon

    I don’t see why they won’t do a triple threat match between Cena, Punk, and Rock for Mania, that’s one of the biggest main events they could ever book at mania that puts over Punk in a huge way. Besides Punk really should keep the belt until Summerslam next year. There just isn’t anyone credible enough to allow Punk to legitamently drop the belt too.

    • Name

      Triple threat=diminished match for all. No, no and no.

  • Bro88

    Idk if I like the idea of Punk vs Taker at mania. I mean I do like that it’d be a damn good match almost guaranteed but I don’t think Taker needs the title, nor could he be able to defend it regularly. This is likely due to the fact that Taker will NOT lose at Mania nor should he. Thus this makes for a conundrum of a situation.

    • Guest

      will NOT? How do you know? You don’t. The fact that Taker CANNOT defend the title on a regular basis would actually even out the predictability. Taker has even said he respect’s Punk. Taker might actually put him over. Taker wanted to do it 6 years ago with Kurt Angle, and he might see Punk as the guy too do it.

    • http://twitter.com/ZackStinson Zack Stinson

      will NOT? How do you know? You don’t. The fact that Taker CANNOT defend the title on a regular basis would actually even out the predictability. Taker has even said he respect’s Punk. Taker might actually put him over. Taker wanted to do it 6 years ago with Kurt Angle, and he might see Punk as his opportunity too retire.

      • Bro88

        It won’t because there is absolutely very little upside to Taker losing. One person will get put over huge yes but Punk is wanting to leave so that would be a wasted choice. Especially since Punk is already way over and doesn’t need a victory over Taker. Plus as I said in my reply to the other guy Taker has been retiring for how many years now? Who’s to say he won’t go for longer?

    • mrchopper

      The streak has to end in order for storyline closure. Vince might not want it to, as it’s guaranteed money every time he’s at WM, but deep down he knows what Taker knows. As the other guys said, it’s why he was happy for Angle to beat the streak when everybody thought Angle was gonna be THE man. Would he be happy to put Punk over? You bet – he’s done it before and it’s arguably one of the reasons Punk went main event or bust. The problem is that the person who beats the streak needs to go on for years being that guy, and Punk’s already said he wants to retire in the next three-five years.

      • Bro88

        You gave one of the biggest reasons for Taker not losing at Mania in your own argument. Whoever does it will be looked at as a potentially huge star but you can’t guarantee any one who does it will stick around long term enough to make it worth it. Its a gamble that’s risks are greater than the reward. The streak is a tradition and in the WWE traditions rarely survive. It adds to the history of the product when there are things people can look back on and say wow look how far that went and it never ended. Plus Taker may be interested in ending the streak but that’s because the streak is just like a title, it has no competitive value. It means little more than this is something to build a story for him. For the fans its something that should be kept as a foundation. And Taker has been supposed to retire for the last 5 years. Who’s to say he won’t go another 5 Manias only wrestling at the big show?

  • lllll

    the primary reasons that creative has yet to unify the belts is because they feel a title match should close out all house shows……. if john cena has one of the belts

  • BrahmaBullRKO

    If Rock vs Cena is gonna happen again, at least make it somewhat different by either turning one of them heel or having it as a title match. Having the exact same match and feud from last year doesn’t sound very appealing. Especially not when there’s potential for fresh matches.

  • Swag Daddy

    I like Punk beating Rocky and facing UT at WM for two main reasons, one being when was the last time we’ve seen such a lengthy reign, it’s not like it’s going to get overly stale or anything anytime soon seeing as to how the Shield is probably going to join him along with Brock. Second reason this could be cool is because it could be UT (past, in most respectful way possible) Vs. Punk (now) Era Vs. Era per say, unless you save that for a eventual SCSA Vs. Punk match or something.

    • andyman07

      the only problem with your era vs era idea is that Punk is not the “now” of this era. it’s still john cena and punk will always be second best. and i dont even like cena im just stating the obvious.

      • Swag Daddy

        Right, I totally agree with you but I mean he might not be the biggest guy in the company come WM but trust me he will be the biggest heel and I feel like they could somehow incorporate that into it all.

  • http://twitter.com/Shaddy_esc_617 Rashad Jackson

    no no no to rock vs. cena II …that match was suppose to only happen once!! not TWICE…why ruin what u said wwe once in a life time..or w.e …dont screw that up…
    i would love to see rock vs. lesnar at WM29…and maybe cena vs. ryback?..that would be great/fun i think…if taker does win at RR..i think he should go after the title on Smackdown..cuz i agree with u i dont think taker will walk with that belt..plus taker is a SMACKDOWN SUPERSTAR!! he has been! for years now..i dont htink hes gon transfer over after RR..cuz he does have the right to face the raw champ or smackdown champ. i think he will go with smackdown unless WWE lets him NOT go after the title and just fight punk respest vs. the streak type of match…but idk..

  • Lord Spliffmeister

    I think they all know that we know that they were gonna make Rock champion.As soon as he stated on Raw the night after Mania everybody knew he would win & then drop it @ Mania.Punk vs Taker would be stupid bcuz like pwnez said he doesn’t even wrestle all year so y hand him the belt? R they gonna end the streak? Highly doubtful. Like I said b4 Ryback vs Cena Punk vs Rock rematch & Taker vs Lesnar. Make it fuckin happen Vince ya cock!!! haha XD

    • Lord Spliffmeister

      Shit they can even start the Ryback feud @ the Rumble & lead it all the way 2 Mania.Actually they can do that with all of the matches I stated.Build the build up 4 the grandest stage of em all. They have their bullshit match @ EC & continue 2 Mania where it all matters.Also what is the logic with fuckin WWE? they don’t want the belt on Rock bcuz it has 2 b defended yet they wanna book Punk vs Taker when we know Taker won’t lose isn’t that the same fuckin boat their gonna be in? XD lol

  • dae

    Punk in any Rumble or WM main event, the way the last two have gone down, would be a potential waste of my money. Rock v. Taker at WM29 would be awesome for the title. Cena v. Taker would be just as good. Punk v. Taker would make me hesitate to pay the money (although, I’d be banking on Taker staying undefeated at WM with the actual purchase of the event).

    • ICEMAN

      The only reason Punk is the last match at WM is because of his long title reign. If it wasn’t for that long title run, he wouldn’t be.. because other than that he isn’t much of a “BIG DEAL”. And that’s the actual truth, whether his asskissing fans want to like it or not. I have yet to see CM Punk literally have the fans on their feet and blow the roof off at the sound of his entrance theme as they did in the past with Austin and Rock. Let’s see how well the audience reacts to him in Brooklyn, NY at TLC. That should be a sign of how the NY/NJ fans at WM react to him as an established main eventer…

      • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

        I’ll gladly point you to him winning the title in Chicago. Moron.

  • ENIGMA

    It should be Punk vs Johnson, and then form a face vs face rivalry with Taker and Cena an have them fight at WM29

  • http://twitter.com/ZackStinson Zack Stinson

    Is anyone else getting annoyed how “Some” people in the IWC have turned on Punk for “Being Stale”. Damn they do it for everyone. In 8 years if Dean Ambrose their golden god was the Face of the WWE, they would call him “Stale”, and say hes “Overrated”. Just like they have with Punk. Punk is not Overrated he literally fought for everything he has, and he’s definitely not stale, him and Heyman is the best part of RAW.

    • mrchopper

      Yeah, but like since Ambrose debuted he’s, like, a bit old and that now. It’s all about Kassius Ohno/Corey Graves/USA Guy/Bray Wyatt [delete as appropriate for whoever hasn’t debuted yet]. Kassius Ohno/Corey Graves/USA Guy/Bray Wyatt [whoever has just debuted] is kinda old and cheesy now.

    • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

      The exact same thing happened with Cena. All of the complete fucking idiots on here will say they’ve always hated him but the reality is he was on of the most cheered heels out there during the thuganomics gimmick. Those cheers are what turned him face and as soon as it happened they started hating him.

      Triple H was the same way, everyone loved the shit out of him during DX and cheered him, but once it became popular to cheer Triple H, the IWC started hating him (anyone else remember people calling in to make fun of him and saying he was “fat” on WWE Byte This? I certainly remember it.)

      Same thing happened to Jericho a few years back when he returned. He came back as a face because the IWC was demanding him because they loved him oh so much, but as soon as other fans they (the IWC) deemed unworthy, such as women or children, started cheering Jericho, the IWC turned on him (this was during his feud with JBL). Fortunately Jericho turned this around for himself by turning heel.

      Another example is Jeff Hardy. Everyone loved the guy when he was part of Team Extreme, but as soon as someone got the idea to push him, people turned on him.

      Remember when the IWC was all high on Orton after he defeated Benoit for his first win? Yeah, and as soon as it was solidified that Orton would remain a top guy, the IWC turned on him.

      You’re right about Ambrose. He’s amazing. So is Ziggler. So is Barrett. And as soon as those guys get pushed to the main event, the IWC will turn on them and try to pretend like they’ve hated them all along just like they’ve done with every other guy I’ve mentioned. The IWC are the biggest marks out there and are the same jackasses that would shout at guys for leaving ECW to fo to WWE or WCW by calling them “sellouts” when those guys were just trying to make a living to feed their families. The IWC are the same guys that will bitch and bitch and bitch and bitch and bitch about how bad Raw is, but then still tune in every single week. The IWC is a joke and one of the worst things to ever happen to wrestling.

      The IWC is stupid. They’re the same idiots who will cheer a guy as a heel midcarder and boo a guy as a face main eventer and then later cheer them again as a face legend. They’re the same idiots who will bitch non-stop about WWE being PG but don’t don’t realize WWE was PG during the first part of their precious Attitude Era as well. They’re a fucking joke that just parrot bullshit they read and have no original thoughts of their own. Pretty much like the same writing staff of WWE that they claim to hate oh so much.

      And before some idiot comments about how if you’re on the internet you’re part of the IWC, no, you’re part of the IWC if you buy into the bullshit that you read on the internet. There’s a reason why most professional wrestlers are AMUSED by the digital dirt sheets of today.Because they view them as a complete and total fucking joke.

      • http://twitter.com/ZackStinson Zack Stinson

        Exactly spot on everything! They also give Kid’s, and Woman shit about following Storyline’s, and not liking Heels, and cheering for Faces, but they do the same exact thing! They hate on guys like Cena, but want him too turn heel so bad, and they would immediately jump back on the Cena Bandwagon. If he turned heel, they are huge fucking hypocrites, and yeah it’s annoying how much they love NJPW, and ROH, but yet they still hang around on WWE site’s complaining about how terrible it is. Then go form a fucking site somewhere else assholes. Seriously I’m about fed up with their shit. I agree, i hate how if you comment, they will say your apart of the IWC too! No I’m fucking not, i didn’t sign up too be a part of their little club. I just like too read spoilers, and comment, and talk with other people about wrestling. Who the fuck are they too claim that all these sites are their’s? And if you comment your automatically apart of the IWC. They are assholes, and they can never be happy, and it annoys me how they act like they can run the company better then VKM, but if they ran WWE it would be in the fucking ground. They are a fucking joke.

        • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

          The reality is if any of the idiots in the IWC could run a company better than Vince, they would already be doing it. And the fact is…they aren’t.

      • Bro88

        Just want to point out, just cause you say things like “they, the IWC” doesn’t mean you aren’t a part of it. The IWC isn’t just one select group on the internet. Its all wrestling fans who comment and share opinion. I’m not disagreeing that some within the IWC are exactly as you said just that you are a part of the IWC the same as everyone else on here.

        • http://twitter.com/ZackStinson Zack Stinson

          Says who?? Who the fuck are they too say that we are a member just because we comment.. This isn’t their site… Like he said you’re only part of it, if you buy into it, and actually believe commenting on websites make’s you a member.. Its complete bullshit. That’s like me creating the IFC, where if you talk about football on the internet, your automatically a member, and they have no choice in the matter.

          • Bro88

            the Internet wrestling community is defined as people who go on the internet and talk about wrestling. Its not a fucking insult to call someone a part of the IWC. We are the IWC. Its not buying into anything. You are a wrestling fan? You are on the internet? To talk about wrestling? That’s all the IWC is dude. You seriously need to chill the fuck out just cause you are confused as to what it really means.

          • http://twitter.com/ZackStinson Zack Stinson

            Ok yeah my last comment made me sound like i dont understand what it is , but i was really tired, So let me say this, yeah it is actually kinda of an insult. The IWC is pretty much full of whiny grown man who take pro wrestling more seriously then the children they are always making fun of for just enjoying it. Yeah some member’s are decent, but why the hell do you always think the wrestlers take shots at “Smart Fans”. Because they know this to be true. Why do you think so many people insult the IWC, because they know it too. I get what it means, but really it’s just a term created by a couple of nerds, but really when it get’s put in the dictionary then I’d be a member, but until then I’m not going to be apart of a group of elite assholes.

          • Bro88

            They make fun of smarks, not all IWC members. THey make fun of the fans who think they have it all figured out and try to come up with ridiculous theroies based off of some minuscule detail they saw in a commercial. People insult the IWC because they think they are better than the IWC when in reality they are worse because of their own actions insult and degrade people who simply love something so much they go online to get their fix when they cant else where.

          • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

            Wrong. THE IWC stands for “Internet Wrestling Community”. i’m not a part of this “community”. I’m a guy who comments on one website about a TV show I enjoy and the actors that portray the characters on that TV show. I am not part of any fucking fan club or organization. You may have your panties in a knot because you get off on being part of this “IWC” but I really don’t give a shit.

          • Bro88

            Yeah my panties are in a knot when you’re the one having a shit fit because you are a part of a culture. Quit acting like you’re better than anyone else on here just cause you don’t admit to being a part of the IWC. Claiming to not be a part of it when you participate in it is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever heard.

        • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

          No. I’m a guy that visits one site (this one) to talk wrestling with other fans. I have no interest in pushing the various agendas of the dirt sheets. And therein lies the difference.

      • http://twitter.com/alpallday adam pitterson

        I hatef that he ” freestyled” with no beat…aka he can’t rap. Not everyone has to agree with u angry internet guy. And you’re pretty wrong about the attitude era as well. Fact of the matter is the pg rating is what made Cena a lame second rate Hogan. Second fact…attitude superstars were better. Hands down at everything. Promos, in ring, storyline…everything. And if you don’t believe that…i got two words for ya

        • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

          Freestyling with no beat I suppose is a matter of personal preference. I’m not a fan of rap in any form so it’s really neither here nor there to me. As for the whole PG era thing, the reality is your precious DX you’re quoting started during a PG era. So you have zero clue what you’re talking about. Second fact, attitude superstars were NOT better. Want proof? How about the Godfather. Was he better than Dolph Ziggler? What about Savio Vega? Was he better than Cody Rhodes? How about Marc Mero? Was he better than CM Punk? The REALITY is some of the attitude era guys were better, some of them weren’t. Thrusting them all into one group and assuming they were all great is just stupid. Honestly, the stable D.O.A. couldn’t hold a candle to today’s Heyman guys. And if YOU don’t believe that…I’ve got five words for you:

          I don’t give a shit.

    • Vinnie

      Why exactly should you care what other people think or feel? Let them feel or think whatever the hell they want. And I think your wrong on the iwc. A majority of them still kiss Punk’s ass as they have in the past.

  • ahndaewoong

    Rock can’t win the belt because he doesn’t wrestle enough and so you would consider putting it on someone who will have wrestled less matches in the past year in a half than The Rock? Punk has been champion for a year and most of the time he cannot main event the ppv and they really expect people to believe he has a shot at beating the Undertaker at Mania? All of this assuming Taker is going to be healthy enough to wrestle at Mania. This could some how turn out to be good or turn out to be a disaster.

  • Jason

    They have so many scenarios for WM 29, that they could swim in it. The big problem IMO is the Rock. Nothing seems to be put in place properly because they want to give Rock the WWE title, and the Rock shouldnt even be in that picture to begin with. Rock should just have his rematch with Cena and that’s it. His interference in the title picture is what is causing the indecisiveness of what to do with him as champ and what to do with Punk! This long title reign storyline Punk has right now is supposed to last all the way to WM 29. This way it would be impactful, and have a logical climax. CM Punks long title storyline is meant to be broken by a new face ready to be pushed to stardom in WWE. Problem is, that star is a damn heel and he’s holding the wrong briefcase!
    Ziggler should have dropped Vickie a long time ago, cashed in MITB on the WHC Sheamus, and lost. Then as a face he would go on to the RR, win the thing, earn his spot and the respect, and put on a classic at WM against Punk in a 30-40 min match to win the title. It should be Rock/Cena II at WM with Cena winning, Taker/Lesnar with Taker winning to gain retribution from ’02, and Punk/Ziggler for the WWE title.
    On a side note, Big Show should go all the way to WM 29 in his last credible run as champion and lose it to Ryback, with Big Show retiring soon after.

  • elvin711

    rock vs punk at RR, rock wins.
    rock vs cena vs cm punk wwe title at EC, brock lesnar interfere and rock drops the title to cena.
    leading up to WM29:
    undertaker vs john cena (wwe title)
    brock lesnar vs the rock vs cm punk
    and triple h vs eve torres

  • Macc Frost

    seems like rock will put punk over boy i tell you rock is the man very unselfish cm punk deserve it , cena must be mad

  • aj2345

    The Rock should face Dolph Ziggler.

  • shitbooking

    Jesus christ, why Cena vs Rock two? We all know Cena would win this time round. Have Rock vs Taker or Brock or even Punk at Mania!!!!

  • morph_3

    If Punk vs Taker makes it to WM, look for Taker to lose and for Punk to also lose as Ziggler cashes in. Two losers in one night and a NEW champ.

    This opens up Stone Cold to eventually face Punk.

    I see Lesnar vs Triple H at WM – ego vs ego.

    Rock vs Cena? Really? been there done that – move on – it wasn’t that great to have a re-do.

    I’d rather see a “Classic” match-up with Shawn Michaels vs Ziggler (two of the best bumpers in the biz) rather than a crappy match.

    • Reality

      For God sake, stop talking about Ziggler cashing in for the WWE championship already, his briefcase is for the WHC!!!

      • http://www.facebook.com/craig.deboard Craig DeBoard

        THANK YOU!

  • Lastride78

    guys, rock beats punk for title, cena/rock title match punk/austin wm, rock cena tile, taker vs brock, for revenge of triple hhh and shawn michsels.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Keegan/100000303737489 Phillip Keegan

    To be honest what I was expecting at WMXXIX was Rock vs Cena II for the title (Probably Cena winning so it’ll be best out of 3 like SCSA & Rock so expect that for the big one in WM30), Brock vs Undertaker (Using the rest of Brock’s appearances for an “Epic encounter” eventhough it’ll probably like 30 minute submission match like Shamrock vs Undertaker Backlash ’99, not saying I won’t love it but I don’t think it’ll be on par like last year) and finally maybe Punk vs Bryan for the WHC (Somehow Bryan or Punk winning the RR and getting the title at No Way Out, I’d say expect Ziggler cashing in at RR too but losing it at No Way Out, either way that would be a good way to go). Also expect matches like Sheamus vs Ziggler, possibly a 4 way tag match for the titles and all sorts of craziness because WM30 is next year and they need ratings to ensure it’ll be big too.

  • HeelDZ

    Unless Undertaker wins the Royal Rumble, I don’t want to see this happen

  • 5er

    I just can’t see Rock losing twice in a row.

  • Blahhh

    I thought the idea for Rock coming back for a “run” at the title was that the old Rock was coming back, showing up every Monday night leaving us with great promos and creatig a great build, not just show up, win the title at Rumble, boringggg

  • http://www.facebook.com/jake.thurlow.9 Jake Thurlow

    i was thinking why not have cm punk beat the rock at rumble by screwing him over and then having the rock face punk at wrestlemania and win

  • suttercane78

    punk beats rock at rumble with help from brock. at mania rock vs brock, punk vs cena 60 minute ironman match.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002196281205 Kenneth Anderson Jr.

    Wow they really are in a tight spot. If they want Rock to get the title then they’ve only got these options:

    -Deal with no title defences on house shows or No defences till Wrestlemaina
    -Somehow offer Rock enough money and convince him to go full time until Wrestlemaina
    -Turn Rock heel and Punk face and work it into a storyline that he doesn’t care about WWE.

    My main problem is that if Rock lost at Royal Rumble, then got challenged by Cena again (Ending Once in a lifetime) What would their beef be, just friendly challenge? And Then Rock looses to Cena at WM29 after Punk, that diminishes his status as a big draw and a legend. But if all that did happen, then Rock could cut a promo about “having tried and done it all” but Stone Cold challenges him one last time at SummerSlam (Often the biggest PPV besides WM) saying we promised the WWE Universe, with Rock’s career on the line. Punk interfere’s, Rock loses and retires and Stone Cold and Punk feud for a year till WM30.

    i do like the Undertaker Idea SavageBomber had tho, but I’d rather see Rock with the title full time somehow.

  • morrisonfanone

    I can see how putting the title on Rock could be a huge concern. He’s not willing to go and travel the way he used to before he started acting. At least (unless he’s seriously injured) Cena’s always there. I don’t want to see a Cena/Rock rematch. I think it would be incredibly boring. I can’t see them putting a title on Taker any time soon. It would be cool if he could play an Edge and retire as Champ, but I just don’t think it’ll happen. Punk vs. Taker would be interesting. Something we haven’t seen in a while.