Dr. Carlon Colker of Peak Wellness asked Connecticut Superior Court to seal hundreds of documents in Grant’s bill of discovery suit against him and his company
Attorneys for Dr. Carlon Colker and Peak Wellness asked the Connecticut Superior Court on Monday to seal around 700 pages of documents containing receipts and medical records belonging to Janel Grant.
Grant is suing Colker and Peak Wellness in a bill of discovery case. Attorneys for Grant allege Colker and Peak Wellness refused to provide her medical records and receipts for treatment when asked during discovery for Grant’s federal suit against Vince McMahon.
A defamation suit was filed by Colker in federal court against Grant attorney Ann Callis. At one point, attorneys for Colker had added Grant’s medical records to the case docket without them being sealed or redacted. The court later took the filings down.
In an amended complaint filed earlier this year, Grant claimed McMahon sexually assaulted and sex trafficked her while she worked at WWE. World Wrestling Entertainment is also a defendant in the suit. Grant filed suit against McMahon in early 2024.
Grant’s health records, and the payment receipts for her treatment, have been at the heart of her bill of discovery suit against Colker as well as her lawsuit against McMahon. According to Grant’s federal complaint, Colker had treated Grant without telling her what pharmaceuticals or treatments he was using. Grant claimed McMahon had paid for all of her treatments except for after she had been fired.
Grant alleges an employee of Peak Wellness assaulted her, along with McMahon, while in the building. During the assault, McMahon is alleged to have performed a bodily function on Grant. In an earlier filing, attorneys for Colker and Peak Wellness said the employee no longer worked at the company. The employee is unnamed in the bill of discovery suit and the federal civil suit.
Colker also filed an opposition to a compliance motion by Grant on Monday. Grant had asked the Grant for the compliance order on Nov. 7, claiming Colker had been refusing to hand over items as part of discovery in the case.
“Defendants have produced just two records—an “audit log” for Petitioner’s electronic medical file and a single text message,” the Nov. 7 motion said.
Attorneys for Colker objected to the motion, calling it overreach by the plaintiff and called it an “open-ended fishing expedition.”
“Defendants have produced hundreds of pages of responsive documents and despite that fact, plaintiff seeks more – more than a limited bill of discovery necessitates,” the motion said.
The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Dec. 8.
